To my Partners:
I hope you are having a wonderful summer.
In our interim report,1 I want to cover 6 things with you:
- How the Fund did,
- What the world looks like from here,
- What we own,
- Fees,
- Mistakes,
- Fund merger.
1. How the Fund did
For the 6 months to June 30, 2026, the Series A and F units increased by 7.3% while the Series B units increased by 7.1% net of all fees and expenses. During this period, the S&P/TSX Index rose by 11.2%, while the Fundata Canadian Focused Small/Mid Cap Equity Index rose by 18.8%.2
July and August have been kinder to us. As I write this, the Fund is up approximately 11% YTD. Nothing stellar but an improvement on the first 6 months.
Further information on McElvaine Value Fund including the Fund’s Interim Financial Statements and the 6-month Management Report of Fund Performance have been posted on our regulatory information page.
2. What the world looks like from here
You won’t like this visual but here it is anyway: you can put me in a tutu, but I still won’t be a ballerina. Companies are no different. Being fashionable, or sitting inside a popular theme, does not create a margin of safety. The margin of safety comes from the price paid and the business fundamentals including financial position.
We are not theme investors. Our focus is on what we are paying and what we are getting. Today’s environment is fragile. That does not mean it cannot repair itself. It does mean, to me, it is best to be careful.
3. What we own
Our holdings are set out in the appendix below: what each business does, what has changed during 2026, and whether I think it is better or worse placed than it was in January. That snapshot includes the cash and securities we will acquire through the Osler Fund merger, which closes on August 31, 2026.
The PDF shows the portfolio as a chart at this point in the report.
A full statement of the investment portfolio is contained in our financial statements.
4. Fees
My philosophy is simple: we should make money when you do.
Our fund has two fees:
- The management fee pays for compliance, payroll and the other costs of running a regulated business. It keeps the lights on, and that is all it is for. In absolute dollar terms, these costs grow more slowly than the fund does. This means the larger we become the less of a management fee we need. It is my intention to lower the management fee as we grow. I call this “scaling shared”.
- The performance fee pays us only when you have made money.
A second issue is the Series F is now our largest series and, in most scenarios but not all, the cheaper one to own. Your outcome should not depend on which door you happened to come through, so I am working on simplifying the series structure and expect to come back to you in the fall with our thinking.
If you would rather be in a different series, you can switch. A move between series of the same fund is not a deemed disposition, so there are no tax consequences. For what it is worth, Kate and I own more Series B than Series F while Lorne and Jen own only Series F.
5. Mistakes
This section is about mistakes: what I got wrong and what I changed as a result. I hasten to add investment mistakes only: you do not need the entertainment, nor I the trauma, of revisiting my dating history.
Investors often discuss mistakes of omission. This is a little self-serving as it only reinforces how smart they almost were. I prefer instead to go deep into the morass! Probably the most painful mistake on my part was how we were positioned in and around 2007. This experience shaped how I think and handle investments today.
Since the Fund began in 1996, the S&P 500 has had four calendar years in which it fell by more than 10%.3
The PDF sets those years out in a table here.
Clearly, I blew it in 2008 but not in the sense I “failed” to predict the crash. The problem was what we owned. The balance sheets and businesses were not resilient. The 2007 portfolio had several investments in the media and entertainment industries. Financial leverage + operating leverage = bad outcome.
This experience, and the 10+ years that followed, led me to these observations:
Defence is in the companies, not in the fund
Our cash has never been the thing that protected us. Cash in the fund gives us choices; it lets us buy when things are cheap. Cash inside the companies we own does something more important: it lets them ride out a bad stretch. To be clear, neither stops a share price from falling. What it protects is the business itself. This is where I (not we) tripped up in 2008.
Following from this, the natural question is: how resilient are our current holdings? The balance sheets of our top investments are set out in the PDF.
Antifragile is best
What difficult periods, including covid, reinforced for me was the value of a company being “antifragile”. This is a concept from Nassim Taleb’s book of the same name. Antifragile was described as: a property of systems that gain from disorder, volatility, stress, and chaos, improving and growing stronger when exposed to shocks rather than just resisting them.
In investing, I have interpreted this as a company comes out of a difficult environment in better shape than it went in. For this to take place, two things are required: a strong enough balance sheet to allow action, and a board and management willing to take action while everyone else is retreating.
Tourmaline in 2020 is an example for us. Through several smart acquisitions, it emerged a better company. The impact for us was significant as an investment with an average cost per share of approx. $13 was sold several years later at a multiple of our cost.
Closing out this section, I thought it would be interesting to reference how Morningstar presents the “resilience” of the Series F units.4
6. Fund merger
The merger of The Osler Fund, managed by Dr. Lorne Porayko, into McElvaine Value Fund will close on August 31. Section 3 shows the combined portfolio. For MVF unitholders the transition will be seamless: securities will be transferred at their market value, so MVF will not assume any tax liabilities from unrealized gains.
Lorne joined us in 2018 and is registered as a portfolio manager. He has been practising medicine for over 30 years, the past twenty or so as a critical care physician and anaesthesiologist here in Victoria. He is a couple of years younger than me and ran a fund on behalf of local doctors for almost ten years before starting The Osler Fund in 2019.
More importantly, he brings something I do not have. Medicine has its own tradition of insisting on evidence before acting, which is why Lorne named his fund after William Osler (the Canadian physician associated with this approach). He applies this evidence-based discipline to his investment research.
Lorne and I work closely on ideas; it has been a useful process for me. With the merger, we looked at several ways to structure our relationship. The simplest was to have him continue managing The Osler Fund assets as a sleeve within MVF. Lorne looks at things differently than I do, often better, and I believe this approach will allow all of us to benefit from that.
Another important consequence of working with Lorne is that we have a clear backup plan if I am hit by a bus. Definitely a nasty outcome for me, but now a non-issue for you!
Closing
I want to end on something that never shows up on a balance sheet.
As you know, I spent many years working with Peter Cundill. One of the things I admired about Peter was that he built a working life around people he trusted and genuinely liked. I find myself in the same circumstances today. I enjoy the relationships we have built here enormously: Lorne, Jen, Matthew, our Independent Review Committee, our service providers, and of course you, who have trusted us with your savings.
I mention it to make one thing clear: you are not partnered with an institution. You are invested alongside a group of people who are approachable, experienced, and who own what you own.
Between us, Lorne, Jen, Kate and I are the largest investors in the Fund. If it does well, we all do well. If we get it wrong, no one pays more than we do. That is how I think a fund should work.
In sum, our investee businesses hold more cash, carry less debt and own better assets than they did six months ago. That is a setup I like. When it will be rewarded, I cannot tell you. I remain confident in our portfolio and in the future.
Thank you for your continued trust and friendship. I appreciate you.
With warm regards,
Tim McElvaine
August 27, 2026